광고 및 협찬 문의
beltjolaman@gmail.com
광고 및 협찬 문의
beltjolaman@gmail.com


This blog content is based on the CNBC article published on September 4, 2025.
The Nasdaq Stock Exchange has proposed a significant tightening of IPO listing requirements, specifically targeting small Chinese companies.
Under the proposed rule, any company primarily operating in China must now raise at least $25 million in an IPO to be eligible for listing on the exchange.
This is not a minor policy tweak — it’s essentially a gate-closing move for many Chinese microcap firms trying to tap into U.S. capital markets.
Winston Ma, adjunct professor at NYU School of Law, commented:
“This will make it much harder for small Chinese firms to list on Nasdaq.”
Notably, the announcement came right after Beijing imposed punitive tariffs on several U.S. optical fiber companies.
China’s Ministry of Commerce accused American firms of circumventing anti-dumping duties and slapped tariffs of up to 78.2% on products from Corning, OFS, and Draka.
Corning — which derives 32% of its non-U.S. revenue from China — was hit particularly hard.
While Washington didn’t immediately respond, Nasdaq’s proposal is seen as a quiet yet strategic retaliation.
Stephen Olson from the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute explained:
“Business, trade, and investment between the two countries are becoming more difficult and complex. The so-called trade truce is hanging by a thread.”
In 2024, 35 China-based microcap companies listed in New York, compared to just 17 U.S.-based ones.
That’s more than double the number — and most raised only a few million dollars each.
These companies typically have market capitalizations between $50 million and $300 million,
but their small offering sizes have been linked to “pump-and-dump” stock schemes.
Nasdaq explained:
“Listings from Chinese companies with offering sizes below $25 million show significantly higher compliance concerns.”
In 2022, FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) issued a public warning:
IPOs from certain foreign-based issuers — especially Chinese ones — were followed by unusual price surges immediately after trading began.
The concern?
“Ramp-and-dump” strategies: foreign investors opening U.S. brokerage accounts and executing manipulative trades weeks or months after the IPO.
This trend has pushed Nasdaq and regulators to act more aggressively to protect retail investors and uphold market credibility.
This isn’t one-sided. China has already been tightening its capital control policies, especially for companies with large domestic user bases.
The country now requires government approval for any overseas listings — especially in tech and platform businesses.
Add to this the latest U.S. restrictions on TSMC’s equipment shipments to its China-based factories,
and the result is a full-spectrum economic and technological conflict.
While China sees a setback, Korea might see an opportunity. Here’s why:
구독을 신청하면 최신 게시물을 이메일로 받아볼 수 있습니다.